02-14-2012 04:25 AM
If there is a Jak 4, I don't really think there's a need to explain why Jak is so skilled at channeling eco this far into the series. We've seen plenty of people who can channel eco (the sages in The Precursor Legacy, Keira in The Lost Frontier, etc) so that skill isn't really that unusual. As for explaining Jak's connection to Mar, I personally believe that they are the same person whick would hopefully mean the game would revolve around him going back to after the first game to fight the Metal Heads and set up Haven City.
02-14-2012 11:49 AM
ok, well why jak harnass eco like that? 1. simple, he's a sage, like samous, gol maya and the other eco sages, but he just can control better then they do and can control every single one. 2 i prefer saying that jak isnt Mar, first the statue of Mar didnt look like him, supposaly all the rift games were destroyed or aaaaaaaaah.... SEE THIS IS THE BIGGEST AND MUST ENERVATING HOLE ON THE PLOT, we will never know. Naughty Dog seriously if not a game at least a book that will explain all of this or a movie.
I just wanted to kill badguys with a giant precursor robot.
02-15-2012 02:37 AM
The stupid thing about Jak 3 is...
The Darkmakers control entire planets and there the most badass force in the universe right? Well if that were you and you lost ans entire ship wouldnt you bel ike "hey what the heck happened to that MASSIVE ship we sent?"
Darlmakers NEED to come back IN FORCE in Jak 4 maybe with a battlefleet >=3
02-15-2012 10:38 AM
Although Jak's birthname is Mar, Jak is only a descendant of Mar
Not necessarily. Samos says at the end of Jak II that they meet Mar someday and his and Pecker's behaviour in the scene pretty much confirms that both of them know more about it than they're willing to say. Also, you can't really rule anything out in a series that contains time travel such as this one.
02-17-2012 01:01 PM
i already said, the statue of mar isnt at all like jak, and do you realise how discusting is if jak was mar, jak had to go to the past, and "make babys" with his grand-grand-etc-grandmother, .......i think i have a good point here