Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Feb 22 2011
By: zpr_DunhamSmash Uncharted Territory 1690 posts
Offline
Accepted Solution

Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

166 replies 750 views Edited Feb 22, 2011

Details here

 

Feel free to discuss!

Jeremy Dunham
Senior Designer, Zipper Interactive
http://www.twitter.com/DunhamSmash
Please use plain text.
Message 1 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 11/27/2009
Offline
1990 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

First

 

 


zpr_DunhamSmash wrote:

 

  • Faction-specific videos have been restored (Blu-ray version only)

 



 

What videos?

 

Please use plain text.
Message 2 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
First Son
Registered: 07/04/2010
Offline
1 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

Not so happy about the neutrality... having a 'home field advantage' while defending was one of the things I really liked about MAG.  Now it's just another FPS.

Please use plain text.
Message 3 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Monster Hunter
Registered: 02/22/2011
Offline
39 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

There goes home field advantage when playing domination. And besides, i thought that the shadow war was all about defending your own oil refiinery, not someone elses. In acquisition, the move will be good, but in domination not so much.

Please use plain text.
Message 4 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 11/17/2010
Offline
849 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

THANKS YOU!!!! FINNALLYYY!!! SOME CHANGES!!!!

 

THNKS YOU ZIPPER!!!



Please use plain text.
Message 5 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 01/06/2009
Offline
313 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

This pisses me off. Now there's even less things that make each PMC unique.

 

I am 100% against map neutrality outside of Sabatoge. I didn't like in on Suppression either.

 

The only way it can work is if the maps depend on who actually has control of them. So if Raven has control of SVER's map, SVER has to get it back.

__________________________

Please use plain text.
Message 6 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 12/20/2008
Offline
291 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

 

I guess it means the voiceovers

Please use plain text.
Message 7 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Splicer
Registered: 01/27/2009
Offline
55 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

It was nice to have your own maps.  It is what made vetting to another PMC exciting, but all good things come to an end.

 

I would still like to see a "PLATOON FRAGO" added to give the platoon leader some leadership abilities besides hopelessly screaming into the microphone telling everybody where to go!

Please use plain text.
Message 8 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 01/27/2010
Offline
3783 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

 


GatorGeek wrote:

Not so happy about the neutrality... having a 'home field advantage' while defending was one of the things I really liked about MAG.  Now it's just another FPS.


Well considering that home field advantage only worked if you were SVER it was no good. I was not one to scream map imbalance, but we needed this a lot.

 

Please use plain text.
Message 9 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 01/27/2010
Offline
3783 posts
 

Re: Patch Alert: MAG v2.11

Feb 22, 2011

 


JediXMan wrote:

This pisses me off. Now there's even less things that make each PMC unique.

 

I am 100% against map neutrality outside of Sabatoge. I didn't like in on Suppression either.

 

The only way it can work is if the maps depend on who actually has control of them. So if Raven has control of SVER's map, SVER has to get it back.


They screamed abuot it in Sabo, now we all know how great it is. Why not make people feel like there are more map options?

 

Please use plain text.
Message 10 of 167 (750 Views)
Reply
0 Likes