02-23-2013 09:47 PM
02-23-2013 10:25 PM
02-23-2013 10:50 PM
Swift444 wrote:WH > SH
Yes, as indicated in so many factors.
02-23-2013 11:03 PM
02-24-2013 12:11 AM
02-24-2013 05:56 AM
Smart-Move wrote:
Go play section 8 then , drop a **bleep** on urself
Who said I wasnt playing Section 8?
Why are you making so many assumptions?
Of course I'm playing Section 8, it helps to take a break from all these broken games.
02-24-2013 09:50 AM
Yes we need a Warhawk 2 for the ps4. But please make warhawk 2 nothing like starhawk we don't want any build and battle, we don't want any stupid beam or flak turrrets that shoot automatically, we want a hard core game like warhawk was to where you have to put in the time to get good. We dont want Warhawk 2 to feel like some stupid COD game. Please use what worked with Warhawk and build from that and forget that Starhawk was ever made or existed.
02-24-2013 11:57 AM
freakyevil wrote:Yes we need a Warhawk 2 for the ps4. But please make warhawk 2 nothing like starhawk we don't want any build and battle, we don't want any stupid beam or flak turrrets that shoot automatically, we want a hard core game like warhawk was to where you have to put in the time to get good. We dont want Warhawk 2 to feel like some stupid COD game. Please use what worked with Warhawk and build from that and forget that Starhawk was ever made or existed.
I think that's a little harsh...
I agree that Starhawk changed some things that many people did not want changed, but some aspects are all around better. The jeep is entirely better, the troop cantrols are better (sprinting anyone?), and I'd say that the tank is entirely better.
I think some aspects of Starhawk should carry over.
02-24-2013 12:19 PM
I agree with every thing and warhawk 2 would need a sprint![]()

02-24-2013 12:50 PM