Starhawk General

[Dark-Quaker]

I ran into someone glitching the other night. I can't oinpoint exactly what they were doing but I was getting killed in one hit, I couldn't lock-on to the guy. Needless to say I called it out on a headset and a veteran play said they were glitching.

Now I understand some of the frustrations I have read from others. Not fun, I got so mad that I put Dante's Inferno in and revisited that.

[Phillyblunz · Accepted solution]

---

Dark-Quaker wrote:

I ran into someone glitching the other night. I can't oinpoint exactly what they were doing but I was getting killed in one hit, I couldn't lock-on to the guy. Needless to say I called it out on a headset and a veteran play said they were glitching.

Now I understand some of the frustrations I have read from others. Not fun, I got so mad that I put Dante's Inferno in and revisited that.

---

Dont let losers who have to cheat to feel "god" about themselves get you down.

Many of the main glitchers and stat padders are well known, just remember their names and know they suck.

You going to be on tonight?

[IRRES169]

Welcome to the flaw that is Starhawk.

The problem is twofold.

1) This community does not take a hardline stand against cheaters.  Frankly because the numbers are so low.

2) even if they did what could they do without a Ban function on the servers?

Also be cautious about labeling someone a glitcher or cheater just because a "veteran" player said so.  They are not perfect in their verdicts.  Sometimes legitimate lag can be percieved as doing something glitchy or cheating.  But don't be stupid either... A guy who only lag hops after taking a flag consistently is generally cheating.

[Samokoske]

Irres said:

Only lag hops

I say:

>_ > hmmmmmm




balls?

[TheGremlinKlown]

more balls?

[Dragonott269_V2]

Yes....more balls!!!

[TheGremlinKlown]

@Dark did the glitcher look like this ?

JK

[ballsmakinze]

Wasn't me. Haven't played since last week.

[Samokoske]

We figured.......


there was a lack of balls in starhawk last week.


we need more