PhoenixArcher128 wrote:
chemicalgroom wrote:
I like how SweetPoison deleted my defense of Manly's sig entry AND the language in the rules that made it eligible.
Nice work SweetPoison. There's a future in Rhode Island politics for you!
That's interesting...MVPs can't delete anyone's (even their own) posts...
He/she can edit his/her own post and email a mod about what he/she perceives as being a reportable off-topic post,requesting that it be deleted (which a mod will do without asking questions 9 times out of 10). Of course, reporting every perceived off-topic post on the boards would pretty quickly drop the activity on this particular forum to 3 posts per day.... and my post was on topic. 
chemicalgroom wrote:
PhoenixArcher128 wrote:
chemicalgroom wrote:
I like how SweetPoison deleted my defense of Manly's sig entry AND the language in the rules that made it eligible.
Nice work SweetPoison. There's a future in Rhode Island politics for you!
That's interesting...MVPs can't delete anyone's (even their own) posts...
He/she can edit his/her own post and email a mod about what he/she perceives as being a reportable off-topic post,requesting that it be deleted (which a mod will do without asking questions 9 times out of 10). Of course, reporting every perceived off-topic post on the boards would pretty quickly drop the activity on this particular forum to 3 posts per day.... and my post was on topic.
Actually...no.
The mods treat their reports exactly the same as ours; they read them and decide if it needs editing or a delete. They don't blindly follow orders from an MVP.
You break the rules, you'll get edited or deleted if its reported. If you don't want to be moderated, follow the rules. Stop blaming others for your mistakes
EDIT: Also, mods can see edits, and exactly what has and hasn't been edited...so editing out objectionable content doesn't always save you from moderation...and editing your posts to try to avoid moderation, but reporting another for something similar can still get you a warning.
