02-17-2013 05:16 PM
02-18-2013 09:23 AM
Starhawk would have been amazing.......if it balanced teams properly and punished, instead of favoring, those with lag.
Platform is irrelevant.
02-18-2013 09:43 AM
Marduk_1_3 wrote:Starhawk would have been amazing.......if it balanced teams properly and punished, instead of favoring, those with lag.
Platform is irrelevant.
platform is completely relevant. Sony has an awful year for devs like Lightbox and Eatsleepplay. TM and SH sold awfully because they were not advertised, Sony was short on money. The console level of advertising (TV, Radio etc.) is not neccessary on PC because you're shoved with Ads everywhere you go, and all new items are listed on steam. The game also appeals significantly more to your PC gamer because they're substantially more intelligent and love tactical games.
02-18-2013 09:50 AM
You don't have to tell me I'm a PC Gamer turned ps3.
02-18-2013 10:35 AM
Marduk_1_3 wrote:You don't have to tell me I'm a PC Gamer turned ps3.
What made you change?
Is PC not the better platform for gaming?

02-18-2013 11:19 AM
PC has more upgrade/maintenance costs.
Plus I use my laptop more for work. Will build a gaming rig this summer again.
02-18-2013 11:24 AM
The first thing that comes to mind would be a MUCH bigger build limit. I think you have a point that it most likely would gain more exposure, but I think the window's closed.
02-18-2013 11:49 AM
With it's current flaws and lack of advertisement it would not sell on any platform is what I meant Stabby.