Reply
Treasure Hunter
Phillyblunz
Posts: 6,677
Registered: ‎12-08-2008

Re: This game still alive?


RubiconAlpha wrote:

That's what cripes me most about Starhawk is there is just nowhere to move around without being owned by pilots when on foot or in a vehicle. Even most of Starhawk's ground pounder servers leave you too exposed when on foot.

 

 

 

I know exactly what you mean.

 

I dont like ground pounder either.

 

 

 
Please use plain text.
PlayStation MVP
PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Posts: 39,282
Registered: ‎12-21-2007

Re: This game still alive?

[ Edited ]

Phillyblunz wrote:

RubiconAlpha wrote:

That's what cripes me most about Starhawk is there is just nowhere to move around without being owned by pilots when on foot or in a vehicle. Even most of Starhawk's ground pounder servers leave you too exposed when on foot.

 

 

 

I know exactly what you mean.

 

I dont like ground pounder either.

 

 

 

lightweight CTF, Ground Pounder Zones!   (i know most people like it the other way because grizzly cannon + sidewinder = BOOM in CTF)

 

 


Please use plain text.
Treasure Hunter
Phillyblunz
Posts: 6,677
Registered: ‎12-08-2008

Re: This game still alive?

See Pilgrim you fell for it, if you respond to some of these guys they will just be tardy about everything.

 

Didnt your mom teach you to not feed the trolls?  

 

The discussion will never bear fruit when you are dealing with someone who has no dog in the fight.

 

When the goal is chaos, the path is meaningless.

 

 

Please use plain text.
Fender Bender
Samokoske
Posts: 3,292
Registered: ‎10-16-2012

Re: This game still alive?

Also, philly. Rubicon. I feel strongest on foot.


this is me helping
Please use plain text.
Treasure Hunter
Phillyblunz
Posts: 6,677
Registered: ‎12-08-2008

Re: This game still alive?


PLYMCO_PILGRIM wrote:

Phillyblunz wrote:

RubiconAlpha wrote:

That's what cripes me most about Starhawk is there is just nowhere to move around without being owned by pilots when on foot or in a vehicle. Even most of Starhawk's ground pounder servers leave you too exposed when on foot.

 

 

 

I know exactly what you mean.

 

I dont like ground pounder either.

 

 

 

lightweight CTF, Ground Pounder Zones!

 

 


Yeah it can be good, I just hate the tank bubble campers on ledges and bridges, they almost just as bad as the hawk bomb spammers.

 

Zones pretty much eliminates this issue as you are always moving around making the bubble campers less of a pain.

 

I guess i like every loadout, I just dont like the way some people play them, its easier to avoid the loadout and guarantee less dooshyness.

Please use plain text.
PlayStation MVP
PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Posts: 39,282
Registered: ‎12-21-2007

Re: This game still alive?

[ Edited ]

Phillyblunz wrote:
 

Yeah it can be good, I just hate the tank bubble campers on ledges and bridges, they almost just as bad as the hawk bomb spammers.

 

Zones pretty much eliminates this issue as you are always moving around making the bubble campers less of a pain.

 

I guess i like every loadout, I just dont like the way some people play them, its easier to avoid the loadout and guarantee less dooshyness.


Yeah I dislike the bubble camping in general, be it tanks or snipers or whatever.    

 

DARN IT LBI WHY YOU GET LAID OFF BEFORE CUSTOM LOADOUTS AND SAVING SERVER ROTATIONS!


Please use plain text.
Treasure Hunter
Phillyblunz
Posts: 6,677
Registered: ‎12-08-2008

Re: This game still alive?


Samokoske wrote:
Also, philly. Rubicon. I feel strongest on foot.

Thats a big part of course, when you kill something while on foot it is an achievement, you feel like you did something well especially if you killed a tank or hawk, but when you use the most OP vehicles in the game getting kills is just expected.  Its the Raven/SVER argument.

 

I like winning a lot more when there is a good chance I will lose.

Please use plain text.
PlayStation MVP
PLYMCO_PILGRIM
Posts: 39,282
Registered: ‎12-21-2007

Re: This game still alive?


Phillyblunz wrote:

Samokoske wrote:
Also, philly. Rubicon. I feel strongest on foot.

Thats a big part of course, when you kill something while on foot it is an achievement, you feel like you did something well especially if you killed a tank or hawk, but when you use the most OP vehicles in the game getting kills is just expected.  Its the Raven/SVER argument.

 

I like winning a lot more when there is a good chance I will lose.


That was like the community night last week when the hawks were divebombing us on the dust map in zones and I pointed my grinder in the air, pulled the trigger, and blew one up as they damaged themself with a cluster bomb, epic to get a G2A grinder kill, its freaking hillarious :smileytongue:


Please use plain text.
Gaming Beast
armyluke
Posts: 1,901
Registered: ‎02-12-2012

Re: This game still alive?

I like WH, probably more than SH, it was more challenging and getting a kill was so rewarding seeing as how much of a pain it was to level up. I like the setting too, its got a great mix of WW2 and a future setting. The Eucadian Hawk easily being one of my favourite vehicles in any game ever, just because of its looks. The Western setting just doesn't work for me.

 

Everytime I go on WH though, its the same map setup in almost every server, CTF on Close Corridors, Northern Bridge and Grinder. They're great maps, they just get very repetitive after a while. I'd probably play more if I saw a greater variation of maps.

 

Although SH is no exception to this problem too.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Winner of Starhawk Beast Award 2012


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Please use plain text.
Treasure Hunter
ManlyMisfit
Posts: 5,541
Registered: ‎11-03-2007

Re: This game still alive?

I'll let you sleep on it, P. It's not hard to understand.

Please use plain text.