Southern_DuDe_20 wrote:
With warhawk, i always wished they combined all the vehicles into one game. That would be an epic battle on omega or tau or even Euchadia.
this would not make any sense........ the vehicles were relatively useless (jetpack maneuverability and the flopship speed). The only person I ever saw use the flopship effectively were the japanese clans I clan battled alongside BSK and Linden of BSK. The APC was a tremendous addition though.
- last edited on by
Stage_Coach
xColdEmbrace wrote:
Mini_Sal wrote:
RubiconAlpha wrote:
Mini_Sal wrote:
DLC being free then having it turn out to just be the maps that are free etc. etc. etc....
The problem was that in Warhawk the new units were tied to the maps it came with and if you didn't buy the expansion pack you didn't get to play with anyone that had it.
Solution, keep the maps free and the new units shareable. I think that was a much better idea than splitting the community into smaller groups, don't you?
Dylan said a lot of things to sell his game, that's his job but I don't feel doped over DLC. Just the "amazing" single player mode and that it would be finished by the release date.
No, I don't.... what about people who don't want to have to shell out money and just play the regular maps on an even kilt? They can't at all they are forcing DLC down the throats of the public by making it essentially mandatory to compete on an even battlefield. Quite disheartening indeed. Think about it, at least in WH after DLC I would be able to play on the same battlefield with all the same opportunities afforded to me. Opposing this mentality, in starhawk players are given a hueg upperhand with the grizzly.
Have you ever shot at a grizzly?
Look at this , acting like he knows what he's talkn about. Grizzlies are useless. You are better off using a Jetpack.
And these ****** are the ones criticizing the game? I'm done hurr.
You can have oreo ice cream or mint chocolate chip. Ok now scratch that you can only have mint chocolate chip now. Which scenario is more appealing? Having more options wins out every time. It's not a matter of effect, it's a matter of providing options in different scenarios.
Mini_Sal wrote:
RubiconAlpha wrote:
Mini_Sal wrote:
DLC being free then having it turn out to just be the maps that are free etc. etc. etc....
The problem was that in Warhawk the new units were tied to the maps it came with and if you didn't buy the expansion pack you didn't get to play with anyone that had it.
Solution, keep the maps free and the new units shareable. I think that was a much better idea than splitting the community into smaller groups, don't you?
Dylan said a lot of things to sell his game, that's his job but I don't feel doped over DLC. Just the "amazing" single player mode and that it would be finished by the release date.
No, I don't.... what about people who don't want to have to shell out money and just play the regular maps on an even kilt? They can't at all they are forcing DLC down the throats of the public by making it essentially mandatory to compete on an even battlefield. Quite disheartening indeed. Think about it, at least in WH after DLC I would be able to play on the same battlefield with all the same opportunities afforded to me. Opposing this mentality, in starhawk players are given a hueg upperhand with the grizzly.
You know you can filter the servers so that only servers with no DLC show up? Oh no you don't.
