11-02-2012 07:05 AM
Too funny. Bate called him a fanboy yesterday. I don't think he is, I mean he's not all like "starhawk is amazballs. erryone should play!" Just saying COD is cookie cutter. To which I agree with him.
11-02-2012 07:12 AM
11-02-2012 07:14 AM
AmnesiaHazeMMXI wrote:
If cod is a cookie cutter then starhawk is a waffle iron.
Not quite sure what you mean by that. Unless you were gonna go along the lines of "anyone can use it and its filled with goop that gets hard."
In that case I would say. I love waffles they are far more delicious than cookies.
11-02-2012 07:19 AM
11-02-2012 07:22 AM
Sounds to me like you should hang out with that freakyevil crybaby.
11-02-2012 07:41 AM
MW 3 is a miserable game. I think I actually prefer SH to be honest. BLOPs on the other hand was a magnificent game. As far as innovative, I don't think people really play a game because it is unique. I sure as heck don't. I play games that I enjoy playing. If a game is one of a kind and I enjoy playing it then all the better, but number one selling point to me is fun factor and playing in huge ground war parties is quite enjoyable. *cues up who let the dogs out*
Ex of unique fun games I loved: Fat Princess, Stacking, LBPs
11-02-2012 08:33 AM
11-02-2012 08:39 AM
AmnesiaHazeMMXI wrote:
Cod is garbage....that's not the argument,the argument is wether or not it's better than starhawk.
Considering cod does not put your ps3 in immediate danger every time you load it up,I presume we can put a tick in the win column for cod
MW games (excluding cod 4) are garbage. Agreed. W@W and BlOps were good games in their own right
11-02-2012 09:09 AM
11-02-2012 09:11 AM