turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
KRaYZiE_KiLLS wrote:KS.
Jorge_Rdz wrote:Oh cool!!! My first SF CW .
KRaYZiE_KiLLS wrote:Yea, it's the both of us. Thats how we planned to make the cell. Most of the top ranked people in FLawLess can invite anyone they want to in the cell.
__CheeseCake__ wrote:Im pretty sure its KK...but im not sure.
Jorge_Rdz wrote:I thought the leader was Teammate?
__CheeseCake__ wrote:Hes the Leader of FLawLess..
ILLMAN wrote:we'll play you with m60, FAMAS, 357, 23, mds and the FAIR weapons, no pick ups at all .. how about that ?BTW are you even in a clan ?
Message Edited by ILLMAN on 10-30-2007 05:03 PM
But anyway, I'm in too,and I'm really looking forward to make some pwnage.
Ok, Jorge, you can be in the CW.
Im fine with using only the given weapons. No pick ups at all. Makes it much easier. M60 FTW!Who are they BTW?
Oh noez!
Cheese be honest.... How often do you actually zoom in? 5,10, or 20% of the time?
I'm not trying to say that you don't, but I know for a fact when someone gets like 4-5 kills almost simultaneously in a matter of seconds they can't be zooming in. I know this because I've used the m82 and after a while it's pretty darn easy to use (without the scope of course).
It ultimately comes down to the m82 being to strong for a sniper rifle.
Llama, I would imagine since you're the only one arguing your points, and EVERYONE else is disagreeing with you, you kinda don't have a right to say who does and doesn't suck.... you say everyone but you sucks, and then say you use the m16k/FAMAS 75% of the time. This is also after admitting the m16k was cheap.
Your arguments = epic failure. Continuing a flame war isn't in your best interest either.
Your arguments = epic failure. Continuing a flame war isn't in your best interest either.
It's not too strong for a sniper rifle. In reality, the M82 (Barrett M107 .50 Cal) is much stronger than this.
MvpBoy wrote:Cheese be honest.... How often do you actually zoom in? 5,10, or 20% of the time?I'm not trying to say that you don't, but I know for a fact when someone gets like 4-5 kills almost simultaneously in a matter of seconds they can't be zooming in. I know this because I've used the m82 and after a while it's pretty darn easy to use (without the scope of course).It ultimately comes down to the m82 being to strong for a sniper rifle.
MvpBoy wrote:Cheese be honest.... How often do you actually zoom in? 5,10, or 20% of the time?I'm not trying to say that you don't, but I know for a fact when someone gets like 4-5 kills almost simultaneously in a matter of seconds they can't be zooming in. I know this because I've used the m82 and after a while it's pretty darn easy to use (without the scope of course).It ultimately comes down to the m82 being to strong for a sniper rifle.
Yea,well it depends..of course if there close together there wont be any scoping..
![Llama[FIRE]~](http://playstationna.i.lithium.com/t5/image/serverpage/avatar-name/environment-clouds/avatar-theme/classic/avatar-collection/environment/avatar-display-size/message "Llama[FIRE]~"){kind=avatar}
Chaos92 wrote:
Llama, I would imagine since you're the only one arguing your points, and EVERYONE else is disagreeing with you, you kinda don't have a right to say who does and doesn't suck.... you say everyone but you sucks, and then say you use the m16k/FAMAS 75% of the time. This is also after admitting the m16k was cheap.
Your arguments = epic failure. Continuing a flame war isn't in your best interest either.
ok, what the **bleep**ing hell....I never said any of this crap...I'm just tired of people like you saying your good, but when it comes down to it yall suck...and for others saying others are good, who after you''ve agreed are cheap, suck too. and I never admitted to the M16K being cheap...you wanna know why I use it? its because I know that who ever I play in any game, maybe 3 of the 4 people are going to use that gun. and no EVERYONE is not disagreeing with me.... and I said I wasnt trying to to continue the **bleep**ing flame war so if you could... please shut the hell up...
This way you will be able to distinguish the real snipers from people that get the "no scope" kills all of the time.
__CheeseCake__ wrote:
MvpBoy wrote:I just think you shouldn't be able to see the crosshairs untill you zoom in.Yea,that would make it more fair. And it would be more realistic.And also kinda tight i think..
Llama wrote:
Chaos92 wrote:
People accusing each other of being cheap on the SF boards? BLASPHEMY!
For the record:
m16k
All shotguns
Camping
Spawn mining
Basicaly all explosives when spammed
All of that = no skill and cheap. The m16k is ridiculously accurate, shotguns leave the person you shoot defenseless, camping = obvious n00bage, same with spawn mining, and not being able to take a step without being blown up is the same thing.
Have a nice day arguing about that, because those are facts, not opinions.yeah ok, those are so facts...M16K = cheap, yeah sure, but anyone can start with it...and I was never camping in that level, I was defending our beacon...I dont see anything in yalls rules of being cheap about that, in fact, I dont see anything wrong with that at all. I dont use the M60 because that gun has the worst accuracy I've ever seen...and incgonito, if you have so much skill, why is it that I've seen you using the M16K too?
You see that part in there that says "M16K = cheap, yeah sure"?
Trying to deny something you said that becomes saved on a forum forever is an even stupider idea than keeping a flame war you can't win going.
I rest my case.
Support
Corporate
Community
Site Feedback
|
Where to Buy
| Terms of Service
|
Privacy Policy
| Country Selector
© 2013 Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
