Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 04/02/2013
Offline
374 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

[ Edited ]
Apr 2, 2013

Seriously? Unbelievable...

 

I thought ND said there would be NO co-op...**bleep** is goin' on here?

 

Why are they considering Co-op? It'll be half-assed just like U3!

Wanna know how I knew U3's co-op was bad? When I finished it, I knew i wouldn't pay $60 for that mode alone.

& if you can't make a multiplayer mode that's at the same quality as the single player, why put it in at all?

 

Then they try and insult our intelligence witth PR's Damage Control.

"Oh, don't worry, it's a seperate team, everything's gonna be fine"

 

Yeah, don't think so.

I heard the same thing for 

-Red Dead Redemption

-Grand Theft auto 4

-Bioshock 2

-Tomb Raider

-Max Payne 3

-Uncharted 2

-Uncharted 3

-God of War Asecsion 

& every other game that had a tacked on multiplayer.

 

I don't want The Laast Of Us to be GOTY,  I want it to be recognized as one of the greatest games ever made. But I don't know how that's gonna happen with things like "Batman Vision", multiplayer, & now Co-op.

 

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about this game. 

 

 

Please use plain text.
Message 31 of 51 (153 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
I Only Post Everything
Registered: 01/28/2011
Offline
866 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013

studio35 wrote:

Seriously? Unbelievable...

 

I thought ND said there would be NO co-op...**bleep** is goin' on here?

 

Why are they considering Co-op? It'll be half-assed just like U3!

Wanna know how I knew U3's co-op was bad? When I finished it, I knew i wouldn't pay $60 for that mode alone.

& if you can't make a multiplayer mode that's at the same quality as the single player, why put it in at all?

 

Then they try and insult our intelligence witth PR's Damage Control.

"Oh, don't worry, it's a seperate team, everything's gonna be fine"

 

Yeah, don't think so.

I heard the same thing for 

-Red Dead Redemption

-Grand Theft auto 4

-Bioshock 2

-Tomb Raider

-Max Payne 3

-Uncharted 2

-Uncharted 3

-God of War Asecsion 

& every other game that had a tacked on multiplayer.

 

I don't want The Laast Of Us to be GOTY,  I want it to be recognized as one of the greatest games ever made. But I don't know how that's gonna happen with things like "Batman Vision", multiplayer, & now Co-op.

 

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about this game. 

 

 


Naughty Dog never said they are confirming co-op. The OP is just saying that he doesn't want co-op but multiplayer only. That doesn't mean there is co-op in the game. 

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Please use plain text.
Message 32 of 51 (148 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Naughty Host
Registered: 02/11/2010
Online
8283 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013

studio35 wrote:

Seriously? Unbelievable...

 

I thought ND said there would be NO co-op...**bleep** is goin' on here?

 

Why are they considering Co-op? It'll be half-assed just like U3!

Wanna know how I knew U3's co-op was bad? When I finished it, I knew i wouldn't pay $60 for that mode alone.

& if you can't make a multiplayer mode that's at the same quality as the single player, why put it in at all?

 

Then they try and insult our intelligence witth PR's Damage Control.

"Oh, don't worry, it's a seperate team, everything's gonna be fine"

 

Yeah, don't think so.

I heard the same thing for 

-Red Dead Redemption

-Grand Theft auto 4

-Bioshock 2

-Tomb Raider

-Max Payne 3

-Uncharted 2

-Uncharted 3

-God of War Asecsion 

& every other game that had a tacked on multiplayer.

 

I don't want The Laast Of Us to be GOTY,  I want it to be recognized as one of the greatest games ever made. But I don't know how that's gonna happen with things like "Batman Vision", multiplayer, & now Co-op.

 

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about this game. 

 

 


gimme some examples of a non Tacked-on multiplayer. Just curious.

Please use plain text.
Message 33 of 51 (145 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 02/25/2006
Online
4027 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013

studio35 wrote:

Seriously? Unbelievable...

 

I thought ND said there would be NO co-op...**bleep** is goin' on here?

 

Why are they considering Co-op? It'll be half-assed just like U3!

Wanna know how I knew U3's co-op was bad? When I finished it, I knew i wouldn't pay $60 for that mode alone.

& if you can't make a multiplayer mode that's at the same quality as the single player, why put it in at all?

 

Then they try and insult our intelligence witth PR's Damage Control.

"Oh, don't worry, it's a seperate team, everything's gonna be fine"

 

Yeah, don't think so.

I heard the same thing for 

-Red Dead Redemption

-Grand Theft auto 4

-Bioshock 2

-Tomb Raider

-Max Payne 3

-Uncharted 2

-Uncharted 3

-God of War Asecsion 

& every other game that had a tacked on multiplayer.

 

I don't want The Laast Of Us to be GOTY,  I want it to be recognized as one of the greatest games ever made. But I don't know how that's gonna happen with things like "Batman Vision", multiplayer, & now Co-op.

 

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't worried about this game. 

 

 


Okay I played Bioshock 2 MP and it didn't feel tacked on. Now I also have been playing the God of War Ascension MP, which is fun. The problem I have with MP games is, it is the other players that make it a terrible experience. I don't buy a game for the sake of MP. Now I have to agreee with that when a developer tries to do both, there seems to be some sort of sacrifice. God of War Ascension is a great game but I feel the story felt like it took a hit, due to the focus on MP. I got Tomb Raider but I didn't get it for the MP; I did dabble in the MP over the weekend. It seems like a regular MP game; pretty much mindless shoot your buddy in the back stuff going on.

 

Thanks,
FreshRevenge

celebrity fashion gallery

 photo 512d0aca-9476-4802-855d-3554158e2e5e_zps0b4ea223.jpg
Please use plain text.
Message 34 of 51 (129 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 04/02/2013
Offline
374 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013
-Street Fighter 4

-Team Fortress 2

-Gears Of War


These games are built around the idea of multiplayer. not the other way around
Please use plain text.
Message 35 of 51 (124 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Last Guardian
Registered: 11/24/2011
Offline
11069 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013
Get back to blops2 yo!!!
Please use plain text.
Message 36 of 51 (116 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Naughty Host
Registered: 02/11/2010
Online
8283 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

[ Edited ]
Apr 2, 2013

studio35 wrote:
-Street Fighter 4Name me a single one on one fighter that has a good story with stellar online. By your logic, it has "tacked on" single player, which isn't better than "tacked on multiplayer". 

-Team Fortress 2There is no single player in the game, therefore it can't be "non tacked on"

-Gears Of War- . Once again, it's single player is nothing to rave about, therefore, according to you, it only has one half of a game worthy to play.


These games are built around the idea of multiplayer. not the other way around

Point is, theres no such thing as "tacked on" multiplayer. You judge the product as a whole. The point of multiplayer is to play with people using the game's mechanics and environments. Are you willing to call N64's Perfect Dark's multiplayer "tacked on"? How about Goldeneye? 

 

EDIT: What makes multiplayer in UC "tacked on" while Gears of War isn't?

 

Please use plain text.
Message 37 of 51 (106 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 07/26/2012
Offline
820 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013

Longbow has already made his return, he is one of the top players on tomb raider, camping it up with a 4 KDR. Longbow has forged the kindgom of longbow on earth. NA take lessons from square enix and tomb raider developers of what makes a great multiplayer.


The Kingdom of Longbow shall reign forever, for it is written in the stars above~
Please use plain text.
Message 38 of 51 (102 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 04/02/2013
Offline
374 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

Apr 2, 2013
The original Modern Warfare is better.
Blops 2 has too many issues
Please use plain text.
Message 39 of 51 (93 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 04/02/2013
Offline
374 posts
 

Re: co-op sucks, if no multiplayer i wont buy

[ Edited ]
Apr 2, 2013

-Street Fighter 4Name me a single one on one fighter that has a good story with stellar online. By your logic, it has "tacked on" single player, which isn't better than "tacked on multiplayer". 

 

1)Tekken 4

 

2) "good" Competetive fighting games have various types of trainging modes & activities, survival modes, & Arcade/story mode. These inclusions make playing fighting games by yourself worth it. 

 

-Team Fortress 2- There is no single player in the game, therefore it can't be "non tacked on"

 

Check your sources again. TF2 can be played alone...with viarious types of bots & special settings to help prep you for competitive play.

 

 

-Gears Of War. Once again, it's single player is nothing to rave about, therefore, according to you, it only has one half of a game worthy to play.

 

Gears Of war not having a good story is your opinion. IMO, I thought Gears 2 had a great story.

 

 

 

I'm not sure you fully understand the term "Tacked On"

In terms of gaming, "Tacked On" means a mode that holds no value...Meaningless...no real purpose other than to fill empty space.

 

A good example of this is Resident Evil 5.

 

-Great Single Palyer

-Great Co-op

-Pointless Competitive Multiplayer

 

The mulitplayer did nothing to help the game whatsoever. It bought nothing innovative or new to the table (in terms of what other multipayer games were already doing)

Therefore, it is considered "Tacked On".

 

For those who say Multiplayer doesn't hinder Single Player, you're absolutley wrong. 

It's more time & more importantly More Money.

 

Money that can be used for better purposes, such as marketing or development.

 

What would be nice, is if they used some of that money for manufacturing a 2nd disc...At 50 gigs a piece, The Last Of Us wouldn't to be so compressed. By doing this, players wouldn't have to sit through a mandatory install when they first get the game.

Please use plain text.
Message 40 of 51 (90 Views)
Reply
0 Likes