Reply
Jun 17 2013
By: khknight Fender Bender 4120 posts
Offline

Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

12 replies 242 views Edited Jun 17, 2013
Like i down one guy with 3 revolver shots, why do i need to put another 2 to kill him? Why not one? I dont think im being unreasonable, a revolver is pretty powerful.

it should only take 1/3 of the original amount of bullets it takes to down to execute an enemy. This should applied to all weapons.
Message 1 of 13 (242 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013
Bump?
Message 2 of 13 (206 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/30/2012
Offline
260 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

Faster in timer? That timer is pretty quick.

 

1 or 2 I can take or leave, I tend to triangle execute anyway. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message 3 of 13 (201 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 08/02/2009
Offline
639 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

Use Semi Auto Rifle.

 

Everyone else does ¬_¬

Message 4 of 13 (201 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

[ Edited ]
Jun 17, 2013
The semi auto rifle does the same amount of damage as the revolver, it also takes 2 shots to execute a downed opponent.

This may sound noobish of me, but it really irks me when i get one shot into a downed opponent and he gets away because i ran out of ammo to finish him. (This only happened to me once but it still irks me) IMO 1 shot should be enough.
Message 5 of 13 (197 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Uncharted Territory
Registered: 01/27/2012
Offline
1298 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

They should keep it how it is.  The reason why?  You have to make the decision whether to risk exposing yourself and doing a special execution (with your first, melee weapon) vs using up a couple of bullets to finish the job.  

 

If they changed it to only one bullet, people would be less inclined to do a special execution.

Message 6 of 13 (193 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Wastelander
Registered: 08/02/2009
Offline
639 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

I must be getting headshots then. SA Rifle is always a one shot kill for me

Message 7 of 13 (191 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Fender Bender
Registered: 03/09/2009
Offline
4120 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

[ Edited ]
Jun 17, 2013
Im gonna have to diagree with u timewarnersux, i believe people will still do special excecutions because of three things.

It gives more points
Its needed for certain missions
And its SO **bleep** SATISFYING
Message 8 of 13 (188 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 07/30/2012
Offline
260 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

Is it too late to add a poll to this? Seems like an easier way to get a idea of who agrees/disagrees/isn't fussed. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Message 9 of 13 (182 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Hekseville Citizen
Registered: 12/18/2009
Offline
358 posts
 

Re: Does anyone else think down enemies should die faster?

Jun 17, 2013

no  because people no one would get revived due to over kill, I like it like that, actually gives us a chance to get revived

Message 10 of 13 (158 Views)