11-14-2012 03:40 AM - edited 11-14-2012 03:49 AM
No surprise. My favorite part about NDI's response is trying to justify how HORRIBLE this game looks. NDI is in total denial about alot of things, or they are on one of the most sophisticated and elaborate trolls of ALL TIME. Either way, it makes NDI look bad.
All the feedback in the world about some basic things in the game, like matchmaking, like party splits, like blindfire, like ROF, like all the varients of SA, and all the stuff that any average fan can tell you is wrong with this title, fell on deaf ears. Either that, or NDI cannot fix it and they don't have the balls to say so.
Well played NDI, as always, well played. I hope the money grab from this title fuels a better experience for the fans on future titles. I don't know how you went retrograde in quality since UC2, but that crap has to stop, for the love of baby Jesus.
The game appears to be a financial sucess for NDI. Too bad it was at the expense of the fan base, the quality of the title, and the respect of many a fan.
Botched. Horribly botched. Across all gametypes and modes there are tons of bugs, glitches, and unpolished aspects everytime you turn around in this game.
Is the character movement/weapon play (in theory) superior? Yes it is. It's they only reason I continue to play the title. Regardless of what mode or gametype I play, I constantly say to myself..."why doesn't that work?" "I''m stuck in the scenery" "Wait, I unloaded two clips in a guy's face, got ZERO hit markers, then got Para-9'd in like 3 shots," or some such COMPLETE BULLSCHLACA that shouldn't be happening in the first place.
That's how I describe the game to folks who don't have it. I NEVER recommend this game. NOT like UC2.
Can you guess why?