Reply
Mar 01 2014
By: Ghost_12985 Hekseville Citizen 395 posts
Offline

Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

6 replies 180 views Edited Mar 1, 2014
OK, I just started getting into co-op online. I play Adventure, the one with a story line.
I've noticed something about it: the third person in the co-op is kind of ignored during cutscenes. It also seemed weird that cut scenes were exactly the same for two and three players.
So was the third player like an afterthought?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you play LBP2? If so, could you take the time to check out my levels?
Check out my LBP.ME
Please use plain text.
Message 1 of 7 (180 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
PlayStation MVP
Registered: 02/11/2010
Online
7420 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 1, 2014
^It is because Co op is a minimum of 2 players, meaning the story has and the map has to function with two players if the third player is unavailable.

That's why you have the third player saying unimportant crap. (Chloe lol)

Please use plain text.
Message 2 of 7 (175 Views)
Survivor
Registered: 12/02/2011
Online
1867 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 1, 2014
What AK said.

They could avoid this in future games if they replace a player with an AI when they leave, but they would have to sort the bugs out, we don't want another Drake from Monastery.
Pepsi
Please use plain text.
Message 3 of 7 (167 Views)
Fender Bender
Registered: 10/29/2011
Offline
3469 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 3, 2014

AKyemeni wrote:
^It is because Co op is a minimum of 2 players, meaning the story has and the map has to function with two players if the third player is unavailable.

That's why you have the third player saying unimportant crap. (Chloe lol)

And with two players only, during conversations the characters have longer pauses, because there is no 3rd person to say the "unimportant crap" :smileytongue:

 

"It seems to be a part of a carved stone tablet"

..

..

..

"Well, let's find the rest of it."




Please use plain text.
Message 4 of 7 (109 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
PlayStation MVP
Registered: 02/11/2010
Online
7420 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 3, 2014
"We need a rifle butt to break this lock."

"I got a rifle and a butt"

Please use plain text.
Message 5 of 7 (98 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Survivor
Registered: 11/22/2009
Online
2191 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 3, 2014

AKyemeni wrote:
"We need a rifle butt to break this lock."

"I got a rifle and a butt"

well she did have one, but she forgot it in Tibet :smileywink:

Please use plain text.
Message 6 of 7 (90 Views)
Reply
0 Likes
Last Guardian
Registered: 11/24/2011
Offline
11022 posts
 

Re: Was 3-Player Co-op an afterthought?

Mar 3, 2014

Not sure why anybody would "complain" about this, i'd say this is just a nitpick, i'm okay with how it is.

Please use plain text.
Message 7 of 7 (82 Views)
Reply
0 Likes