Firstly, I'd like to say hello to everyone who still goes to these Uncharted forums and still plays Uncharted 3 multiplayer. You guys are dedicated people. I, on the other hand, took a loooong break from Uncharted, but now I'm back.
Now, onto my topic. WHY IS THE KAL-7 SO INSANELY BAD?!
As if the recoil isn't bad enough, the damage is so effing bad!
I load 75% of my KAL-7 clip into some guy that wasn't even looking at me. He just turns around, shoots me about five times and I'm done. No lag, all my shots definently hit.
I like using the more challenging guns (KAL-7, FAL, Dragon Sniper, Raffica) but this is just ridiculous. The fact that an M9 user can land like 5 shots and kill while I need to land like 13.
**bleep**. Why is this gun even in the game...
lol, What a warm welcome!
Anyway, I understand that, but it seems like before the KAL-7 was a little better.
Not to sound ridiculous, but the Kal-7 was clearly not meant to be aimed DTS("Down The Sights", aka with L1). The gun was built to be blind-fired, and nothing more. Aiming the Kal-7 is equivalent to blind-firing the Dragon sniper; It is not something that was meant to happen. Some believe this is a broken mentality from Naughty Dog, but I really like the idea of that sort of variety. The issue is that blind-firing itself is way to effective, making people hate the thought of a blind-fire central weapon.
You actually don't sound ridiculous by saying that the KAL is a blindfire only weapon.
I understand that it really wasn't meant to be aimed down sights, but it's effective for me. What i'm saying is that is could use a slight damage increase.
(speaking of blindfire, i beat a blindfiring M9 user by blindfiring my Raffica.
DEN ESPLAIN Y I LOST TO AN M9